The Exploding Elephant in the Living Room

There's an ongoing story being covered at WorldNetDaily that no one else is touching. World Net Daily isn't exactly the Weekly World News so why hasn't this story gotten legs? Here's why: in order for it to be true, it would have had to involve a conspiracy and conspiracies are not an acceptable method of explanation. Conspiracies spell the death nell of credibility, so let's not call it conspiracy. Who wants to be called a whacked out conspiracy buff?

Maybe the term 'cover-up' would be more acceptable. Yeah, let's just call it a 'cover-up' and now go ahead and read the plausible reportage. Then ask yourself why Sandy Berger was stuffing data into his pants and maybe more importantly, why isn't his document theft being prosecuted.

But, whatever you do, don't refer to this story as a conspiracy.