David Limbaugh Reviews Men in Black
David Limbaugh's new column, which reviews Men In Black, is posted here and at Townhall. Here's a sample:
Americans can't afford to let this issue casually slip by them. Our future as a sovereign nation, independent of the "international community" depends on a Supreme Court and judiciary that recognizes the Constitution as the final arbiter of the law as opposed to some judge's political agenda.
We cannot tolerate judges who look to international law for the basis of their rulings. Five out of the nine supremes have expressed opinions that they can and do consider extra-constitutional law to determine decisions. Where's the logic? Where's the outrage?
Maybe Levin's book can awaken more Americans to the freedom threatening crisis in our courts.
When we understand that our liberties depend on the sophisticated scheme of institutional limitations the Framers of the Constitution imposed on the federal government, we will grasp the urgency of the message of Mark Levin's new book, "Men in Black."This is an important column by Limbaugh about an important book.
In "Men in Black," Levin takes us on an engrossing ride through history detailing how the Supreme Court has arrogated to itself a sort of tyrannical power that threatens our constitutional architecture and freedom.
We often hear of the dangers of an unchecked judiciary. But few of us have the historical, legal and constitutional background that sets this menacing problem in context. In this book, Levin provides that context in a remarkably readable work that at once educates and captivates.
"Men in Black" is a primer on the United States Constitution as well as a clarion call to liberty lovers to wake up to the alarming damage the Court continues to inflict on our republic. Levin documents how the Court has morphed into a super-legislature, legislating from the bench rather than honoring its constitutional role of interpreting the laws.
Americans can't afford to let this issue casually slip by them. Our future as a sovereign nation, independent of the "international community" depends on a Supreme Court and judiciary that recognizes the Constitution as the final arbiter of the law as opposed to some judge's political agenda.
We cannot tolerate judges who look to international law for the basis of their rulings. Five out of the nine supremes have expressed opinions that they can and do consider extra-constitutional law to determine decisions. Where's the logic? Where's the outrage?
Maybe Levin's book can awaken more Americans to the freedom threatening crisis in our courts.
<< Home