Crazy, huh?

Michelle Malkin posted a good piece written by John S. Ford MD, MPH, who comments on the Afghani decision to declare Abdul Rahman insane to avoid execution. The piece is titled Psychiatry, a tool of social engineering:

"To me this is a very disturbing story. It seems that the provisional Afghan government is trying to find a manageable way out of a terrible public relations nightmare.

Apparently, their decision to prosecute a muslim for the crime of converting to Christianity has provoked worldwide revulsion. There is an obvious perception that their catastrophic disregard for religious freedom exposes the Afghani government as primitive and backwards.

Psychiatry to the rescue. As during many dark times in world history, a government is seeking respite through the misapplication and manipulation of science.

Rather than upset their constituency, the Afghani prosecution has engaged in the age-old deception of diagnosing mental illness when it serves the state's purposes. They have raised the possibility that the accused, Abdul Rahman, is insane and can therefore not be prosecuted under Islamic law.

How convenient.

Afghanistan avoids the global firestorm they've caused by executing someone for creating an affront to Islam. At the same time they evidence a facade of civility by refusing to prosecute this "poor" mentally impaired man.

To even imagine that this highly dubious notion will be adequately examined and that an accurate picture of his true psychological profile will be brought to light is laughable. Whether it's Afghanistan trying to defuse a political liability or the Soviet Union or China claiming that dissident political views constitute mental illness worthy of commitment, this perversion of science is wrong.

Everyone within the healing professions should decry this blatantly transparent abuse of the mental health discipline."

At the risk of sounding a bit paranoid, I can see this happening in a country or world run by leftists. After all, when Christians express disapproval of abortion, adultery, homosexuality and Godless behavior in general, the secular world views those beliefs as archaic and unacceptable in the post-modern, moral relativistic realm. We must be crazy if we don't acquiese to the dogma of the left. With this in mind, can we ever allow them or their ilk to be in charge?