Robertson calls radical Muslims "Satanic"...well, duh!
Have we come to the point that it is strictly forbidden to call evil, evil? O', that's right, egalitarian, moral relativistic, secular, politically correct societies don't recognize evil, as such, and so whenever someone,(especially if that someone is Pat Robertson) attaches the moniker, "satanic" or "demonic" to something evil (aside from conservatism, white heterosexual Christian males, Enron, Halliburton, Big Oil in general and virtually everyone in the Bush administration) the media becomes apoplectic. Could a Robertson apology be far off?
See Robertson's claim that radical Islam is 'Satanic.'
I am a bit confused about Robertson's claim, however. He seems to base the "Satanic" characterization because they desire world domination. They surely may, but that, in itself, wouldn't necessarily make them "Satanic." I would say that their culture of death, torture, cruelty, inequality, destruction, fascism and overall Nihilistic nature is what puts them on the "other side." That they insist on "killing the infidels," if that's what they intend lends to Robertson's credibility as well.
No apologies here...Pat Robertson is spot on regarding the Islamo-facists.
See Robertson's claim that radical Islam is 'Satanic.'
I am a bit confused about Robertson's claim, however. He seems to base the "Satanic" characterization because they desire world domination. They surely may, but that, in itself, wouldn't necessarily make them "Satanic." I would say that their culture of death, torture, cruelty, inequality, destruction, fascism and overall Nihilistic nature is what puts them on the "other side." That they insist on "killing the infidels," if that's what they intend lends to Robertson's credibility as well.
No apologies here...Pat Robertson is spot on regarding the Islamo-facists.
<< Home