O'Reilly:Viagra for the United Nations
Bill O'Reilly has a piece at Townhall criticizing the U.N's impotence. Wait a minute...they're not all impotent over there! What about all those child rapers and abusers among the U.N. "peacekeeping forces" around the world. I don't think their impotence ever came into question.
You might want to read O'Reilly's column which rightly describes the U.N.'s shortcomings (pun intended), but as far as I'm concerned, an impotent U.N. is the only kind of U.N. I want to exist.
Imagine this global Nutty Professor if it were actually Buddy Love...Ok that's not the greatest analogy, but suffice it to say, the world is a much better place by having a totally incompetent U.N. than a powerful, effective U.N.
A potent U.N. would be the worst dictatorial super-thug the world has ever seen. It's not that difficult to imagine. The U.N. is anti-U.S and anti-Israel. A potent U.N. would have much more clout around the world to garner support among our enemies.
A potent U.N. would allow Israel to be eradicated by Islamofascists.
A potent U.N. would have continued to allow the massively corrupt "food for oil" program and Saddam Hussein would still be in power.
A potent U.N. would be in control of the internet and enforcing a global tax to better fund their power.
A potent U.N. would diminish our sovereignty.
A potent U.N. would have a world court which would take precedence over our constitution.
A potent U.N. would impose socialist environmental treaties such as Kyoto which would utterly ruin western economies.
A potent U.N. would encourage international socialism and thwart capitalistic economies.
A potent U.N. would be the worst thing that could ever happen to the global community.
In "global-speak" a potent U.N. would be "unsustainable!"
You might want to read O'Reilly's column which rightly describes the U.N.'s shortcomings (pun intended), but as far as I'm concerned, an impotent U.N. is the only kind of U.N. I want to exist.
Imagine this global Nutty Professor if it were actually Buddy Love...Ok that's not the greatest analogy, but suffice it to say, the world is a much better place by having a totally incompetent U.N. than a powerful, effective U.N.
A potent U.N. would be the worst dictatorial super-thug the world has ever seen. It's not that difficult to imagine. The U.N. is anti-U.S and anti-Israel. A potent U.N. would have much more clout around the world to garner support among our enemies.
A potent U.N. would allow Israel to be eradicated by Islamofascists.
A potent U.N. would have continued to allow the massively corrupt "food for oil" program and Saddam Hussein would still be in power.
A potent U.N. would be in control of the internet and enforcing a global tax to better fund their power.
A potent U.N. would diminish our sovereignty.
A potent U.N. would have a world court which would take precedence over our constitution.
A potent U.N. would impose socialist environmental treaties such as Kyoto which would utterly ruin western economies.
A potent U.N. would encourage international socialism and thwart capitalistic economies.
A potent U.N. would be the worst thing that could ever happen to the global community.
In "global-speak" a potent U.N. would be "unsustainable!"
<< Home