Want Hurricane information in Broward County, FL? Then get rid of Rush! (this is a Limbaugh twofer)
Ya just gotta love the intolerant left who demand that you be tolerant of their warped ideas and values while they have full permission to dismiss ideological opponents. When I say "ya gotta love them," it's true...if you don't love them then you're a bigot, a homophobe and on the fast track to demonization and marginalization.
The latest brouhaha over leftist intolerance involves a Broward county radio station that airs Rush Limbaugh:
Read this piece...no doubt El Rushbo will comment on this.
(Here's an update on the Broward County/Limbaugh brouhaha.)
Ironically, David Limbaugh scores a homerun with his most recent column about the intolerance of the left; his column seriously tackles the problem of freedom of religion and freedom of speech:
The latest brouhaha over leftist intolerance involves a Broward county radio station that airs Rush Limbaugh:
Rush Limbaugh has long been a thorn in the side of liberals, but now, because of him, some Democratic politicians don't even want to join with a local radio station to broadcast hurricane information.
Radio station WIOD, AM 610, has been the official channel for emergency information from Broward County government for the past year. The County Commission, all Democrats, balked at renewing the deal Tuesday, unable to stomach the station also being home to Limbaugh's talk show.
Commissioner Stacy Ritter said she did not want to support a station that's out of step with area politics. Ritter, a Democratic stalwart in the state Legislature before being elected to county office, cited talk shows hosted by Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and WIOD's partnership with Fox News.
Read this piece...no doubt El Rushbo will comment on this.
(Here's an update on the Broward County/Limbaugh brouhaha.)
Ironically, David Limbaugh scores a homerun with his most recent column about the intolerance of the left; his column seriously tackles the problem of freedom of religion and freedom of speech:
The Times reports that, in response, GNEA posted a flier on the employee bulletin board stating, "Preserve Our Workplace With Integrity: Good News Employee Association is a forum for people of faith to express their views on the contemporary issues of the day." It also said it opposed "all views which seek to redefine the natural family and marriage," which it described as "a union of a man and a woman, according to California state law."It's an excellent column that needs your attention. Please hit the link and read the whole thing at his website.
A lesbian employee complained to the city attorney's office that the flier made her feel "targeted" and "excluded," which prompted a supervisor to remove it because it violated the city's anti-discrimination rules.
But it didn't stop there. A city deputy executive director sent a memo to city employees saying the GNEA flier "contained statements of a homophobic nature" and warned employees they could be fired for posting similar materials.
Two GNEA employees filed suit against Oakland, claiming a violation of their First Amendment rights, in view of the discriminatory practices of the city based on the content of the messages.
The district court rejected the claim, as did the 9th U.S. Circus Court of Appeals. The 9th Circus' opinion stated, "Public employers are permitted to curtail employee speech as long as their 'legitimate administrative interests' outweigh the employee's interest in freedom of speech." Legitimate administrative interests? You've got to be kidding. It also approved the district court's characterization of the GNEA employees' speech interests as "vanishingly small."
Unless the Supreme Court reverses these rulings, the words "natural family," "marriage" and "union of a man and a woman" can be banned as hate speech in government workplaces, while Bible and traditional values bashing will receive the highest protection.
Can someone explain how the government has a "legitimate administrative interest" in forbidding the expression of biblically based views; how it is "homophobic" for government employees merely to affirm principles supported by the Bible and thousands of years of civilization, yet not heterophobic and Bible-phobic for government employees to directly trash the Bible and traditional values; how a lesbian employee can claim she was targeted and excluded when nothing was said or done to her, while the real victims, the GNEA employees, were genuinely "targeted" and punished?
<< Home